Vous êtes ici :
- Accueil
- Actus
- Actualités
- Publication,
D. Buyukyazici, O. Brossard et R. Boschma publient sur European Economic Review : "Circular economy transition of European regions"
Publié le 22 juin 2026
–
Mis à jour le 6 juillet 2026
Date(s)
le 22 juin 2026
Abstract
The transition towards a circular economy (CE) represents not only an economic shift but also a profound social and institutional transformation that redefines production, consumption, and policy. This study provides the first macro-level empirical assessment of the CE transition across European regions over the last two decades. It then examines how regional regulative, normative, and cultural–cognitive institutions shape regional CE performance, while also accounting for key confounding factors, including EU cohesion funds, regional autonomy, and the EU Circular Economy Action Plan (CEAP). The results reveal strong spatial and temporal heterogeneity, as well as distinct effects across institutional dimensions. Regulative institutions exhibit the most consistent positive association across and within countries. Normative institutions matter most within major regions, while cultural–cognitive institutions provide more modest support for CE efforts. Importantly, the combination of all institutional pillars is associated with the largest gains in circularity. EU cohesion funds significantly support CE progress, while the post-2015 results suggest that the CEAP reshaped the relative importance of institutional pillars. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of coordinated institutional frameworks and targeted policy support in advancing the regional CE transition.
Keywords : Circular economy, Circular transition, Institutions, Sustainability, Regions
Aller sur l'article en ligne
The transition towards a circular economy (CE) represents not only an economic shift but also a profound social and institutional transformation that redefines production, consumption, and policy. This study provides the first macro-level empirical assessment of the CE transition across European regions over the last two decades. It then examines how regional regulative, normative, and cultural–cognitive institutions shape regional CE performance, while also accounting for key confounding factors, including EU cohesion funds, regional autonomy, and the EU Circular Economy Action Plan (CEAP). The results reveal strong spatial and temporal heterogeneity, as well as distinct effects across institutional dimensions. Regulative institutions exhibit the most consistent positive association across and within countries. Normative institutions matter most within major regions, while cultural–cognitive institutions provide more modest support for CE efforts. Importantly, the combination of all institutional pillars is associated with the largest gains in circularity. EU cohesion funds significantly support CE progress, while the post-2015 results suggest that the CEAP reshaped the relative importance of institutional pillars. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of coordinated institutional frameworks and targeted policy support in advancing the regional CE transition.
Keywords : Circular economy, Circular transition, Institutions, Sustainability, Regions
Aller sur l'article en ligne